Skip to content
October 8, 2017 / subramanyam

Hindu Human Rights Report 2017

We have multiple reports on Human Rights that are published worldwide; there is no dearth of such reports being published in India too. Prominent organizations like USCIRF, Amnesty International, Human rights watch, etc.. publish their reports on Human Rights (say Human Rights violations) in India. However, there is a glaring difference here, while the human rights reports worldwide do report the attacks on both majority and minority communities (Religious Majority/Minority), in India, the reports focus mostly on the human right violations committed against Minorities and Dalits alone.

One of the prime reasons as to why the crimes against Hindus goes unreported is probably due to the biased views of the mainstream media. A number of media houses in the country are biased and they under-report the atrocities on the Hindus.

At this juncture, one ought to congratulate for the work they did andHindu_Human_Rights brought out a report on the Human Right Violations done against the Hindus. This report discusses the troubles and travails of Hindus in Hindustan.

The report begins with the discrimination Indians face in the hands of Government, it speaks about the way the Hindu temples are managed by the governments and the way the money from the temples is diverted for other activities. Then, we look at the horrors of RTE, the way the skewed policy is making the Hindus shut down their schools is very well articulated. The stats that were given in the report present a shocking picture.

The report then focuses on the attacks on Hindus from the hostile ideologies. Dravidian Ideology outrightly attacks Hindus; then we have the so-called intellectuals who have an alliance with the left wing extremists these people also attack Hindus. Then we have the Islamic extremists and the Christian extremists who outrightly attack Hindus.  Then the Christian proselytizing in India and the troubles they are creating to Hindus is another truth that is under reported.  All these incidents have been documented in the report.

The report has extensive stats and even the web links of all the crimes committed against the Hindus.  One should thank the Indiafacts for bringing all these crimes to light.  They tried to compile the entire data and have it in a single place.  They (The authors) also tell us that many crimes against Hindus go unreported and only a fraction of them have been brought out by the means of this report.  Nevertheless, we are still indebted to them as we get to know the scale and intensity of the attacks on Hindus, due to this report.

This is report is very welcome step and great first step in documenting the atrocities against the Hindu community in the country.  The authors of the report gave good number of recommendations at the end of the book as to how these attacks and the discrimination against Hindus can be stopped.  Right from the governments to the common man on the street , every one of us needs to read and understand these recommendations and work for the implementation of them.

Thanks a lot to the IndiaFacts team for getting this report out.

Dear friends, do have a look at the report, it will change your perception on Hindus.  Happy Reading.

October 2, 2017 / subramanyam

Immortal India – My Take

I am very scared of picking up books that re-tell Indian itihasas. The reason, my conservative views. Hence I read the Amish’s books very late. I read Shiva Trilogy very late and that too because a girl spoke about the leadership lessons she learned from the book. Here is what I wrote about it then. I did not read the Ramayana Series of Amish as yet as I have my own doubts.  This is by and large changing now but I am still rigid in many areas.

However, when I saw Amish’s Immortal India, I wanted to give it a try as Amish was speaking about the nation. Here is the blurb that caught my attention and made me go for the book.

India, a culture that witnessed the dawn of civilization. That witnessed the rise of other cultures and watched them turn to dust. It has been celebrated and attacked. Admired and vilified. But through all these millennia, after all the ups and downs of history, it’s still here! And now, after a few centuries of decline, it’s driving a new dawn once again. Ajanaabhavarsh. Bharat. Hindustan. India. The names may change, but the soul of this great land is immortal.

Amish helps you understand India like never before, through a series of sharp articles, nuanced speeches, and intelligent debates. Based on his deep understanding of subjects such as, religion, mythology, tradition, history, contemporary societal norms, governance, and ethics, in Immortal India: Young Country, Timeless Civilization, Amish lays out the vast landscape of an ancient culture with a fascinatingly modern outlook.

As the blurb points out, this book is a compilation of articles and speeches (of Amish) covering myriad topics across history, mythology, social issues, and religion.

The book begins with a section on Religion and Mythology. Amish speaks about his faith,Amish the way he is a devotee of Lord Shiva.  Then we get to see his thoughts on Lord Rama, the purpose of God, his thoughts on Divine Feminine and other topics. The article on Lord Rama is my personal favorite, the way he understood Lord Sri Rama is amazing.

The second section of the book speaks about social issues. Amish begins with a piece on LGBT rights in India, then moves on to give his views on the Caste system, religious violence, government, corruption, the way the TV debates are happening in the country, the age of money in which we live and Ancient India’s approach to Charity. I loved his views on each of these topics. My personal favorite in this section is the article on Charity. Here Amish compares the Ancient Indian model vis-a-vis the current one the world is following and tells us as to how and why the former was much better. He also speaks about having focus and the importance of leading a life that is focused on a few objectives. That makes this section is a must-read.

Then we get into the section on History. Amish voices his opinion on the Aryan Invasion Theory and bogey of lies that are being peddled along with it. Then he speaks about the Young Indians, their rebellious nature and his views on it, he speaks about the importance of history, and why we ought to educate ourselves on that subject. Then he speaks about the freedom of expression, the importance of our Vedic learning and a few other topics. I loved the piece on “British Mumbai — Aamch Mumbai,” this speaks about the much-forgotten fact that Britishers were actually smuggling Opium through India and the erstwhile Bombay was one of the centers for this. I also liked the piece that deals with “The Laws that are dividing the country”. Then the piece on Wajid Ali Shah is something one should not miss; it is heartening to know that a Nawab helped a musical tradition to be alive when the nation was under a hostile occupation.

The last section deals with Amish’s Musings, he tells as to what gets him going, why he writes, spirituality & his son, some of the most impactful incidents of life with his Mom, his sister and his wife. He ends the book with a patriotic manifesto where he discusses swadharma vs. the collective greater good.

All in all a fantastic book. The only drawback might be the fact that we see ideas getting repeated, sometimes you read the same content more than once, this could have been avoided. Nevertheless, this is a must read for every Indian.

I have always argued that the best-selling authors must speak about social issues too. Given the amount the following that they enjoy, every word they utter can metamorphize itself into an agent of change. In his speeches, articles and Q&A sessions Amish did speak with a sense of responsibility and gave the right message to his audience.

I thank Amish for doing the good work and bringing the book out. I did not know that Amish writes this frequently, I shall definitely keep following his articles going forward.

Do read the book.  This is a must read for every Indian. It tells us a few things that we all ought to know but are unaware of.  It speaks about the the Immortal nature of the this great country and its civilization.  Do read it. Happy Reading.

You can buy the book here.

September 7, 2017 / subramanyam

Avishi : My Take

This review is overdue for quite some time now. Yes, I did complete reading Smt. Sai Swaroopa Iyer’s book “Avishi” a few days ago. Here is my take on the book.

Before I give my opinion. Here is the Blurb of the book.

Long before the times of Draupadi and Sita
Immortalised in the hymns of Rig Veda
But forgotten to the memory of IndiaOpiobe1c5-avishi2bfinal2bcover
The Warrior Queen with an iron leg, Vishpala
Brought up in the pristine forest school of Naimisha, Avishi reaches the republic of Ashtagani in search of her destiny. When Khela, the oppressive King of the neighbouring Vrishabhavati begins to overwhelm and invade Ashtagani, Avishi rises to protect her settlement, but at a high cost. Separated from her love, her settlement broken, with a brutal injury needing amputation of her leg, can Avishi overcome Khela?

The queen Vishpala gets mentioned in a few verses of Rig Veda. It is told that the Gods of good Health “Ashwini Devathas” blessed her with a metal leg. The verses and the story available in the Vedas can hardly help a person create a short story, but then you are reading Sai Swaroopa Iyer dear friends, this lady made a novel out of this story.

The story begins with a small girl being saved from the repercussions of a palace coup and taken to a gurukul in the forest. This girl grows up to be a warrior. She leaves the forest to find her life’s purpose in a republic called AshtaGani. Now what challenges does she face there, how does she end up getting into fights that prove costly for her? How does she end up in a situation that needs the amputation of her leg? Will she be able to overcome the perils of her life? If yes, at what cost? Read Avishi for all the answers.

What did I like in the book?
Creating Avishi itself from the few verses in Rig Veda :  The research the author did on various Bhashya’s and arrived at the book is in it self a great achievement.

f70a8-img-20161125-wa0001Narrative:  Sai Swaroopa normally has a narrative other than the main plot of the book. While the story is about Avishi and she overcoming her perils, we see an underlying narrative that comes out clearly from the intentions of Khela and Anudatta. Do Economic Dominance and politics of aid ring a bell? Yeah, read the novel, particularly with today’s world in mind.

The way the author uses people from various walks of life and involves them in the story : The descriptions of Ashtagani are wonderful. The author shows how a farmer, a smith, a cowherd, a doctor, a potter are all equally important and should have a say in the day to day matters of the state. In a way, Ashtagani is an ideal society one can dream of. I loved the work because the author goes on to shw that even such a society can become weak when its people become weak. In a way you learn some Statecraft here.

The author’s eye for detail : While creating the societies of Jambudvipa, she takes enough care as to speak about the sort of dresses they wear, the things they use to save themselves from winter, the ornaments they used, the division of labor in the societies etc. That was done very well.

Un-put-downable  :  The word says it all, the pace of the book is superb.

Coming to the areas that I thought could have been dealt well.
Now, these are my opinions only. Probably due to my excessive attachment with the characters.

The question on marriage is left unanswered in the book. The book ends with a work around, but a solution would have been fantastic. My sole reason for this is, from the reading I did on the Sanatana Dharma, and its texts, marriage as an institution was always there. Right from the days of Prajapatis who were the direct descendants of Shri Chaturmukha Brahma Deva. So where did this question of this not being an institution come in and when and how was it solved. The author could have ended this subject on a high note. This might not have been the core subject of the book, but when this finds its mention in the first few chapters, there should have been an answer.

The last fight could have been better. There was a drag, and that could have been avoided.

This is my personal bias, to a person on the road like me, the male characters except for the antagonist and Shula seem to be incomplete. It is not that they are imperfect, I say it again, it is not that they are imperfect,  they are good in their own sense but we donot see a sense of satisfaction or joy in their lives, it is as if misery is after them.  Somehow, I felt there lives could have been sprinkled with a few moments of Joy.   Moreover, having read Abhaya, I was expecting more from the characters of Avishi.


A must read work on the ancient Indian Society. Please don’t go by my biases, the areas of improvement that I suggested are purely my opinions you might find it different when you read it. Do read it when you have time. A fantastic piece of work by Smt. Sai Swaroopa Iyer. Do read the book Happy Reading.

You can buy the book here .

September 3, 2017 / subramanyam

Victory for Hardwork

Is Nirmala Sitharaman the first woman defense minister of India? Or is she the second? Did Modi consider woman empowerment while elevating her to the position of a defense minister?  Is BJP more committed to Women empowerment than congress, does Nirmala Sitharaman represent the Nari Shakti ?The congratulatory messages, the debates and probably every other discussion in the country seems to be around these lines.

To me, Nirmala ji has achieved this with her dedication and hard work. It is not empowerment or appeasement. She worked hard and got her due at the high table. We


More Power to You Madam— You are an inspiration

must be proud of the fact that a woman with a humble background achieved and  scaled these heights. We ought to respect the hard work she puts in. In fact, we ought to emulate work ethic and commitment this lady brings to the table.

Honestly, I did know about Nirmala ji before 2012. I used to see her in T.V. Debates after 2012. She used to stump the other panelists with the depth of her knowledge. I used to respect her for her research and the clarity of thought that she brought into her words.

She became a minister of state for commerce in 2014 and honestly she was one of those ministers who stayed away from lime light. We never saw her receiving the coverage that a Smt. Sushma Swaraj ji or Smt. Smriti Irani received. However, for keen observer, she was one of those ministers in the government who gave elaborate statements on the government schemes and plans both in the Parliament and out side too. Please check her speeches on GST, the stand of India in WTO, SEZ policy in India and many other issues. Then, her work with Start Up India received many accolades. She did all this as a junior minister for commerce.

Now, the Prime Minister and the senior ministers decided to have her as the defense minister, and she was inducted into the cabinet today.

One needs to understand all the years of hard work that has got her here. Yes, definitely it is a moment for celebration that a woman made it to the top. It is so good to see a woman take charge of something that was considered to be a male bastion.  However, just making a statement that this is true women empowerment and ignoring all the toil and all the hours she put in to get to the top is a disservice to Nirmala ji’s achievement.

It is not just with her, every Minister of State who worked hard to prove his credentials was rewarded with a bigger responsibility today. Shri Piyush Goyal who made the PM’s “Rural Electrification Mission” a huge success was rewarded with one of the most important portfolios “The Railways.” Same is the case with Dharmendra Pradhan ji, his good work in the Petroleum Ministry saw him get a cabinet rank. Then Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi ji,  his good work saw him become the cabinet minister for Minority Affairs.

In stead of discussing the genders, the castes and regional and sub regional politics we ought to discuss as to what got these people there? We ought to emulate their dedication for their jobs and the long hours they put in. That to me is the greatest take away from the cabinet rejig that happened today.
Bharat Mata ki Jai


Image Source :

August 20, 2017 / subramanyam

Effective Evaluations — 2

In the last post, I gave some tips that I knew regarding evaluations. This post is a continuation of that.

Analyze the Content of the speech.

Content is a tricky area. Many would argue that the content of the speech is best left untouched and as an evaluator, we ought to focus only on delivery of the speech. This is a very valid argument, and I do respect it.

I would respectfully differ from that argument and say that we can indeed try and analyze the content too. It is tricky but definitely worth a try.

Every speech has a purpose and an objective. As an evaluator, we ought to understand this part first. As we listen to the speech, we need to note the following.
(i) Generic Purpose of the speech
(ii) Specific Purpose & Objective of the speech

Once we understand the specific purpose / Objective of the speech, we ought to see as to how the speaker is trying to arrive at this objective.

If the speaker is trying to persuade/inspire the audience (most of the speakers try to do this), he/she would have to establish the problem first. Then they would have to tell us as to what motivated them to think about the solution and how they arrived at the solution. Then they will have to tell as to what the audience can take away from this / What they want the audience to do.

As an evaluator, we should not question the idea of the speaker. However, we can definitely look into the supporting material that the speaker has used to develop his/her arguments in the speech.

We can and should comment on the following areas.
1. The logical flow of the argument in the speech.  Does each of the stories contribute to the specific purpose of the speech?  Is the speaker arriving at the conclusion in well phased manner or is the speaker gate crashing towards the conclusion.

2. The time dedicated towards establishing the problem vis-a-vis the time spent on explaining the solution.  A speaker cannot harp on the problem for 5 mins and rush through the solution in a minute and conclude. Ideally, the problem statement, the realization, the solution must all get significant slices of time.

3. Logic Vs Emotion. Sometimes the speakers try to overuse the emotion so that the audience stays with them. For example, if I am speaking on a “rags to riches” story. I might harp more on the poverty of the protagonist and ensure that the audience of swayed to accept my position. However, I also need to tell the audience very logically as to how my protagonist came out of it. I cannot shirk it off by saying; he fought all this out with his determination. Every fight needs determination, but how did the protagonist fight it. Where did he get the help from, what tools did he use, how many time did he/she fail in the fight. Tomorrow if someone in the audience is fighting a similar battle how can they do it?

All this must be told. IF I am not doing that, I am just using emotion and not logic. Emotion is the biggest enemy to logic and memory. People might feel good for that moment. However, they would see no value in the speech after the emotion subsides. If you are my evaluator, I would want you to look into this trap of emotion vs. logic and let me know if I balanced both emotion and logic in my speech.

4. Appropriateness of the content to the audience. We ought to write speeches based on the audience. While I might be knowledgeable enough to speak about the economic conditions of the sub-Saharan nations I might not want to do that as a speech in ToastMasters meeting as it might be of little interest to my audience.

Did the speaker speak about a topic that is relatable, does that add value to the audience, what is the direct benefit that the audience would have from such speech? We can definitely applaud the speaker if the topic adds value to the audience.


August 12, 2017 / subramanyam

All The Best Avishi

~ Release Day Blitz ~
Avishi by Saiswaroopa Iyer
12th August, 2017
Long before the times of Draupadi and Sita
Immortalised in the hymns of the Rig Veda
But largely forgotten to the memory of India
Is the Warrior Queen with an iron leg, Vishpala
Brought up in the pristine forest school of Naimisha, Avishi reaches the republic of Ashtagani in search of her destiny. When Khela, the oppressive King of the neighbouring Vrishabhavati begins to overwhelm and invade Ashtagani, Avishi rises to protect her settlement. But peril pursues her everywhere.
Separated from her love, her settlement broken, with a brutal injury needing amputation of her leg, can Avishi overcome Khela?
Read an Excerpt
“I am the Queen! This will be my throne!” The seven-year-old chirped leaping from the middle of the porch towards the broken mortar which served as a mock throne. “You will be my guard!”
“Guard?” the man pondered scratching his unkempt beard.
“No.” He shook his head and smiled seeing her indignant eyes. “I will be the Queen’s elephant.” He beamed.
Sukratu stepped out of the house to see his daughter in action, perching herself on the tramp Loha’s back, pretending in all earnestness that he was her elephant. He smiled and was about to set out for his duty as the night guard of the King. A sudden lightning appeared in the eastern skies. Sukratu had barely walked a few paces when a deafening thunder made him instinctively turn towards home. He heaved a sigh, finding Loha shielding the girl as if he would, his own child.
“Father, don’t go.” The girl pleaded.
Sukratu smiled and shifted his gaze towards the sky. He saw dark clouds loom over the city. The monsoon winds had started to make their presence felt. He had to reach the palace soon. “Isn’t my little Queen brave?” He called out.
The girl nodded. He saw the fear fade. From her eyes. From her heart. She knew she was the queen! Pride filled his heart. His mind ached to stay home but duty beckoned. Tearing his gaze away from the one he treasured the most in his life, braving the drizzle that would soon turn into a storm, he unwillingly walked towards the King’s residence. Sukratu’s house was in the third ring of the concentric structure of Vrishabhavati. In the centre, was the structure, that served as the residence of the king and as the centre of all trade activity of the city. Here no wealth or goods could change hands without the king’s knowledge and approval. The residences of the noblemen formed the two rings around it. The guards and soldiers forming the outermost circle with the citizens living around them.
As per the protocol, Sukratu approached General Ugra’s residence quite ahead of his reporting time— an hour before the moonrise. He walked into the empty courtyard. But the rain made it impossible for him to stand there any longer. He knocked at the giant wooden door fervently. The doors creaked as a strange woman clad in a dark indigo garment opened them and glared at him with a frown on her forehead.
General Ugra, Sukratu knew was never faithful to one woman. His superior’s romantic exploits were not his concern either. But something about the woman at the door disconcerted him. “Please let General Ugra know that…”
“He has already left for the palace!” The woman frowned before attempting to shut the door.
“What? How ca…” Sukratu’s words hung in air as the door slammed on his face and the woman disappeared from his line of vision all of a sudden. Something did not feel right. He knocked at the door again. Firmly this time, as though seeking answers. Any change in the reporting time would have been announced the day before and he remembered that nothing of the sort had happened. His knocks went unanswered. Frowning and muttering under his breath, Sukratu hurried towards an empty cowshed three houses away from Ugra’s place hoping to catch his companions who he knew would be equally surprised.
The first to arrive was Khela, the eighteen-year-old guard, holding a metal shield above his head. The newest addition to the King’s guard, Khela was related to General Ugra and Sukratu felt that his position in the King’s guard was largely a result of undue favours that Ugra showered upon an otherwise impudent boy.
“Sukratu! By the great Varuna, I should have come to you earlier!” Khela hurried towards him. Pausing for breath, he added. “Our platoon has been given a relief tonight! It was a sudden decision and I personally informed all the others.”
“Relief for tonight? That happens only when…”
“Our guarding hours change from night to day!” Khela completed in a hurry. “Now, come with me.” He turned towards the western direction and the javelin he held started to sway dangerously and came close to grazing Sukratu’s arm.
The older guard’s instincts made him dodge the cut. “Where?” Sukratu hissed, visibly annoyed, first with the fact that he was kept in dark about the change in guarding hours and then about Khela’s irreverent behaviour. “And watch who your weapon hurts, boy.”
Khela shrugged and changed the position of his weapon. “We are now going to the place.” He winked, stretching his hand in the direction. “Follow me, this is the only night we get to have some fun.”
Sukratu did not move. The place he knew implied the tavern where wine was served. “We cannot drink tonight, Khela. When do we have to report tomorrow? By sunrise?”
“You ask too many questions. The rest of us are there too!”
“That does not answer my question.”
“Well, I don’t know, and I don’t care to. The palace is paying for the wine. Are you coming or not?”
The last sentence sounded more like a threat than an invite. Sukratu had all the mind to give the youth a piece of his mind and storm back home. His daughter would be overjoyed to see him before she went to sleep. It gnawed at Sukratu’s heart every day to leave her under the care of Loha— the tramp who had begged him for shelter about six months ago and then became a part of his life. The girl liked him instantly and had begged Sukratu to let Loha live with them and he, despite his misgivings about the tramp’s origins and his unkempt appearance, could not refuse his only daughter. Over time, Sukratu felt grateful for Loha’s company. Now his daughter did not have to be all by herself every night. The guard’s home would have been unguarded if not for that stranger. Sukratu brushed aside these thoughts and had almost decided to go home when the thought of meeting other senior guards and clarifying the confusion struck him. He followed Khela’s lead, making no attempt to hide his displeasure.
When they reached the tavern, Sukratu to his dismay, found many of his brothers in arms deeply drunk. “When did they reach here and when did they…”
“Quite some time before. I just forgot to tell you in advance!”
Sukratu’s eyes scrutinized the men and women of the tavern who were serving wine to the guards. There were no other citizens or travellers in the tavern.
“Just for us, the whole night!” Khela said as if reading his thoughts, bringing him an earthen goblet.
The older guard accepted the goblet taking his first sip with a sense of foreboding.
“Where were you all the time, old friend?” The voice belonged to Tunga one of the senior guards in the platoon.
The grin on his friend’s face brought a smile to Sukratu’s lips. “Tunga, what is this about the sudden change in our guarding hours?”
“The King… that imbecile, has finally remembered that we are human too!” Tunga guffawed, emptying his goblet, waving vigorously at a woman of the tavern who obliged with a seductive wink.
She approached them, skilfully distributing her attention between both the men, winking at Tunga and pouting her lips at Sukratu. Her brows rose at Sukratu’s filled cup. “Don’t keep the Sura nor this Sundari waiting, my love…” Serving Tunga his wine, she placed her fingers upon Sukratu’s shoulders, digging her nails into his skin for a moment locking her gaze with his and turned around swiftly, letting her light upper garment rest on his face for a fleeting moment.
It was a wilful invitation and Sukratu knew it. His attention though was caught by the colour of the garment. The Indigo hued garment! All the women of the tavern wore clothes of the same colour. So did the woman he saw in General Ugra’s house! Was Ugra at home while the woman lied that he was at the palace? If the General and the whole platoon of the night guard were lying down drunk, who was minding the security of the King? Sukratu looked at the rest of the guards. No one seemed sober enough to talk. The only sober man Khela had disappeared!
“By the great Varuna!” Sukratu exclaimed aloud and rushed out, pushing the woman who tried to stop him away.
He raced to the King’s residence, as fast as his legs could carry him. The huge wooden gates of the structure were closed and secured from inside. The rain lashed drowning his cries. Misgivings regarding the King’s welfare made him shudder. He had to meet General Ugra. Something told him that the General had his own reasons to send the whole platoon of guards to enjoy a drunk night. He was a guard who had sworn to protect the King with his life. The general owed him an answer. Sukratu rushed to General Ugra’s house determined to confront him.
That, Sukratu realized was the biggest mistake of his life.
At the gates of the general’s residence he saw a familiar figure hurrying out of his house, a heavy bundle on his shoulders. “General Ugra!” he called out, feeling relieved.
The figure started, and the bundle fell to the ground. Sukratu came to a sudden halt as he realized it wasn’t a bundle after all, but a blood-drenched corpse. A stroke of lightning from the sky revealed the face and the very familiar greying curls. Sukratu froze for a long moment before he could speak.
 “K… King…”
Something hit him on the head even before he could utter the name. Sukratu staggered, reeling at the impact, clutching at his long sword in a vain attempt to defend the next move.
“Finish him!” The General shout behind him.
Before he turned around, Sukratu felt the cold metal tear into his back. Lightning struck revealing the contours of the person. Khela! The javelin stabbed him again. Thunder drowned his screams. Falling to the ground with the weapon still stuck to his back, Sukratu lifted his sword and managed to slash Khela’s palm though the latter, unlike him was vigilant and alert. Crawling away from the menacing duo, knowing very well that he could not last more than a few moments, Sukratu’s thoughts, went to his innocent daughter. She would now languish as an orphan remaining in dark about the monsters who killed her father. Or would they kill her too?
Sukratu would never know.
About the Author:
Saiswaroopa is an IITian and a former investment analyst turned author. Her keen interest in ancient Indian history, literature and culture made her take to writing. Her debut novel Abhaya, set in the times of Mahabharata was published in 2015. Avishi, her second novel set in Vedic India explores the legend of India’s first mentioned female warrior queen Vishpala.
She holds a certificate in Puranas from Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies. She is also trained in Carnatic Classical music and has won a state level gold medal from Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams.


August 4, 2017 / subramanyam

Effective Evaluations – 1

In the past few weeks, I was fortunate enough to deliver a few sessions on Effective Evaluations in the ToastMaster clubs of Hyderabad.

I did get to learn quite a number of things as I did these sessions.  I intend to share a few of them in a series of articles. I hope that they would be of some use to the contestants of the Speech Evaluation Contest.

In the first article of this series, let us look at some of the common mistakes we tend to commit when we evaluate a speech.

Common Pitfalls to be avoided.  In a way avoiding these pitfalls is a Hygiene factor for a good evaluation.

1. I am speaking on behalf of the audience:
We typically believe that we are speaking on behalf of the entire audience. Remember as an evaluator we are voicing out our thoughts only and not the opinions of everyone in the audience. Hence, please do not use the any of the following words: “the audience was with you, You had all of us in grip, we as the audience did not like this” etc.  Remember many in the audience might not share the same view point, hence, it is always good to use “I”  word.  for example , we can use

  • In my opinion
  • I got connected with the speech
  • I felt that
  • In my analysis
  • My recommendations
  • In summary /To Summarize

2. Giving too many points would help the speaker.
The truth is it does not. Pick 5-6 points (3 good, 3 areas of Improvement ) and present them. Tell the speaker as to why you picked them. Give specific recommendations. This is more than enough. The depth of the evaluation helps the speaker more than the breadth of it.

3. Repeating a point adds emphasis
In reality, it does not, on the contrary, you might come across as a person obsessed with a trait in the speech. Some might even say that We were not sure of the point we made and are justifying ourselves by repeating it. (Particularly while making a recommendation). So, once you have made a specific commendation/recommendation, move on to the next point.

4. My job is to tell all the traits of a good speech 
The evaluation is your opinion/reaction to one particular speech of the speaker. That’s it, nothing more nothing less. Many times we as evaluators are tempted to the speaker about the ideal traits of a good speech. This is good, but then it makes us waste a lot of time. (we only have 3 mins) So, please focus on the speech at hand and give your recommendations how it can be improved.  Again, while suggesting an improvements ensure that the particular suggestion is actually doable.

5. I as an Evaluator matter a lot
It is often touted in every of our meetings that evaluation is the best thing in ToastMasters.  It is very true.  However, the unspoken rule is that  we as evaluators are only giving our opinions; it is up to the speaker to pick what he/she wants.  Since we are giving our opinion, we need not be too sympathetic or too harsh on the speaker.  We can speak in our  tone and deliver it as our opinion.  Again, I said we need not be too sympathetic.  We definitely need to be sympathetic and our evaluation must come across as a sensitive and motivational one.

That’s it for this post. Please share your opinions on this , the next post on Effective Evaluations would be out soon.

Note : These are not my own words/realizations.  I have picked these things from the TM manuals and added my flavor to them.  So the credit goes to ToastMasters.